Skip to content

Blog Home

Sherry Thomas GuestBlog: Knights in Rusty Armor & Damsels Not-in-Distress

By Michelle Buonfiglio Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 , 12:25 am EDT

From Michelle: Sherry Thomas' debut romance, "Private Arrangements" is one of the best romances I've read. Ever. Yes, it's so good, I think Mssrs. Strunk and White might condone that redundancy. Buy it. Devour it. Pre-order her July novel, "Delicious." Please offer Sherry your warmest "Where have you and your books been all my life" Bella buongiorno...

From Sherry: When Michelle interviewed me for my feature story, she asked me a very interesting question: Who is your romance hero, dark, brooding bad boy, or white knight in shining armor?

In real life I adore a good man. I think of my husband as a wonderful example of a knight in shining armor. We've been married almost twelve years, and I am almost sure I've never seen him brood-he's too busy! He washes dishes, does laundry, cooks, holds down a high tech job, and is a great dad on top of it.

But while it's wonderful to be married to him, I never use him as a template for a hero. Why? Because romance requires conflict; a good romance requires intense conflict. And Dear Hubby is very good at not getting us into conflict.

Does that mean my romance hero is the dark, brooding bad boy? No. I don't much care for bad boys. The only reformed bad boy that I've ever seen in real life is Warren Beatty. Most other examples of bad boys go on to be unfaithful husbands, not exactly inspiring to a writer of love stories.

So who is my romance hero, then? As I told Michelle, I like to think of him as the dark knight in a sometimes rusty armor. The Crusades sucked. His butt is hating the saddle. And if he comes across one more damsel in distress, he is going to run her over himself.

Of course, I haven't written this particular hero yet. And I don't do medievals. But Sir Nameless here interests me. What happened on the Crusades that sucked so much? Why hasn't he found another line of work if he doesn't care to get on a horse again? And who is the damsel-not-in-distress who is going to make him want to spit polish his armor and win every tournament in sight for her?

In real life, short-comings in those around us tend to drive people nuts. But in romance, character flaws are what drive a book. The greater the initial imperfections, the more meaningful and satisfying journey to that point where readers close a book not only believing in the author-supplied happy ending, but can imagine for themselves the wiser, better Sir Nameless as a loving husband and father who not only keeps the castle safe, but also occasionally picks up the broom and sweeps the rushes when all the servants are down with flu.

So, dear readers, who is your romance hero? And do you know what happened to my Sir Nameless to make him the dark, grumpy knight that he is?
***

It's Sherry Thomas Week at RBTB! Click here to check out why Michelle gave Sherry's new book 5 Stars! Don't forget Sherry's AuthorView, and great excerpt from "Private Arrangements."

Registering to Comment?
Tip: Don't leave spaces in your UserName
Non-U.S. Viewers: Use CA/90210 as state/zip code
Problems: mbuonfiglio@rbthebook.com

comments

Comment viewing options

Comments per page:
See oldest first   |   Expand all
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Oh - right, and obviously, after she does that, he's stunned and realizes he's fallen madly in luuurrrvve.
Sherry,

He almost runs her over on his horse, and she tells him off for doing it. After all, she's not a distressed damsel!
... Yes I need more sleep. *angelface*
MaryKate,

Yes. I have read LOS. And Jessica Trent is just the kind of woman to bring a scoundrel to heel. Too bad we don't see her nearly often enough!

Bev,

A little dissonance can be marvelous, non? We all lie to ourselves once in a while. And it's part of growing up to be able to face the truth and see past those fabrications we use to justify our action.

Aliquis,

I can live with that HEA for Sir Nameless. But can anyone tell me how he got it?

Michelle,

::whispers:: Wrong enticement. Much better to promise me a 10-course spread. Because writers on deadlines (which I just came off last night) don't do grocery shopping. Their fridges are empty and they are starving. :-)
So, Sherry, you're remaining decidedly mute on the Tiffany's enticement-for-medieval scheme... I thought every girl got dreamy over the little blue box? And that pretty white bow?
hiya, aliquis! I LOVE your happily ever after for Sir Nameless and his DNID. :)
My favorite romance heroes are a mix of everything and rather complex - that's why they're so interesting. They've got a great personality, can be sweet and kind - yet have some sort of angst/issue to work through. Generally the angst is dragged around in a way that would be horrible in real life, but makes for a great read in fiction. Unless it goes too far. Then I'll be smacking myself with the book wondering why I'm reading it. And hitting myself.
Sir Nameless finds himself a damsel *not* in distress, settles down and has a happily ever after. With no more crusades. Ever. :D
mmmm, Portia...moral dubiositiousness (it's a damn word if I say it is) is a wonderful treat in a hero. Dubiositiousness of morality is a theme sort of examined subtly and overtly throughout Sherry's PA. But she's got a knack for doing something like that and still making it fun and funny, and at times satisfyingly heartrending. (Oh, God. Strunk and White are appalled w/me today).

Hi, cy! I must see KOH. Keep forgetting about it, and wanted to since I first saw the trailers way back when. I'm pathetic as a movie fan, aren't I? You guys put me to shame.

see, Stace? Moral dubiousitiousness at its finest. And you picked up on it from the beginning. It kinda hits home cause we've all got the spectrum in us, ya know?

Oh, good God, MK. Did you get filtered on c.rack? I must say, I adored Camden from the start, and totally felt for Gigi's position -- how she's been so pulled upon from different quarters while she's still basically a teen. Camden made me smile with his youthful earnestness. I love how tangled up they get in their emotions throughout the book, and how it keeps all kinds of tension going.

yes, Beverly, that juxtaposition of thought and deed was beautiful, and part of the reason humor works so well in this book (cause ironic humor is created that way, too). These two have an intense, albeit brief, history of sharing on what we'd call the soul mate level. They're two fairly brilliant people in their own ways who clicked on every level before they split. And we see that connection even during the tension and confusion when Camden returns after Gigi asks for divorce.

I like what you said, stace, about the book being smart, but not intimidating. PA is one of those romances that one can read for fun and love, or can read and think, "oh, that's kinda brilliant writing, but not in any pedantic 'oh I've got to show you how smart I am' way' on Sherry's part." That is a great skill, and my favorite type of book: one that speaks to many types of romance readers.
That's one of the reasons I so loved these two, they are very flawed and not at all the completely good, altruistic people we seem to see in romance so often. They are selfish and vengeful which to me, makes their journey so much more interesting. And what I love about Camden is that is actions don't coincide with his thoughts sometimes and vice versa. 14 hrs and 53 minutes until he could have her again. Priceless!
Sherry - Have you read Lord of Scoundrels by Loretta Chase? One of the more believable heroines reining in a bad boy ever, IMO. Jessica Trent ranks up there with my all time favorite heroines.
Sherry, I believe Sir Nameless is grumpy because -- even though he left the Crusades and Knights Templar ten years earlier -- he's never forsaken his vow of abstinence. You see, I also enjoy a nice, strapping virgin hero...

I have to say I LOVE your idea, Michelle. One of my favorite books is For My Lady's Heart by Laura Kinsale. And the poor hero, a true white knight, wasn't a virgin, but hadn't been laid in 13 years because his wife entered a convent and he thought he had to be faithful to her. And boy when he met the heroine he was just dying for some. It was so hot. :-)

Cyclops,

Isn't it awful that I know about Kingdom of Heaven only because I read somewhere that they had to "special effect" hair onto Orlando Bloom's chest? Did you believe the chest hair? :-)

Portia,

Yes. I like heroes who rediscover their inner worth and good during the course of a book.

Stacy,

I hope you like the rest of PA too.

It's interesting what you said about my characters, esp. since when I do not require them to be sympathetic right out of the gate, only that they be interesting and suck me into their story. If I ever met some of my favorite romance heroines in real life, I'm probably be completely intimidated.

And oh baby, I love those still-waters-run-deep heroes.

MaryKate,

I'm glad you liked Camden and Gigi in the end--they are not such awful people, just awful to each other. :-)

I think I would love a well-done bad-boy-reformation story. But it would have to have a rather extraordinary heroine for me to believe in it--the run-of-the-mill virgin/near virgin just wouldn't cut it for me.

And Bellas, thank you for such a warm welcome. And a great big thank you to Michelle for the invitation and the wonderful review. Michelle, you rock!